.png)
I've watched this pattern play out a dozen times now.
Founder hits $1M-$3M ARR. Growth is slowing, pipeline is thin, and they decide they have a marketing problem.
So they hire a marketing generalist at $120K-$170K. Smart person, good resume, plenty of energy.
Six months later, they still have a marketing problem. Plus payroll.
I talked to Michael Rowell, a fractional executive leader who's worked with dozens of early-stage SaaS companies, about what founders get wrong when hiring their first marketer. "If you have budget for one person, you probably shouldn't be hiring that one person yet."
When founders tell me they need a marketer, I ask: "What do you need them to do?"
The answer is usually a list:
That's seven jobs packed into one headcount.
And you don't actually know which of those seven things would make a difference. You just know you're not doing them.
Michael put it this way: "A lot of times what founders think is 'oh I have a marketing problem.' Maybe. There's probably a GTM problem in there somewhere. But you're so busy working in the business, you're not working on the business."
You haven't mapped your GTM motions or figured out whether the bottleneck is top-of-funnel, activation, or retention.
So you hire someone to "do marketing" and hope they figure it out.
They won't.
Before you hire your first marketing person, bring in fractional leadership long enough to understand the problem.
A good fractional CMO or growth strategist will:
Michael's seen this work repeatedly: "That [sometimes] six months to 12 months of fractional work is to go: we're not gonna go hire demand gen if our messaging isn't working yet. We're not going to spend all this ad money if the leads aren't converting because we've got a positioning problem."
You figure out what's broken before you commit headcount to fixing it.
And the economics work in your favor. If you're about to spend $150K on a full-time hire who might not solve the problem, spending less on fractional leadership to get clarity first is the better bet.
Michael raised a point that founders miss.
"It's not just: I have budget for one person. Do you have budget for that one person AND all the things they're going to need?"
Your first marketing hire can't do their job with zero budget. They need:
If you have $150K for a person but $0 for execution, you've hired someone to send emails and hope.
A fractional leader can often deploy budget more effectively than a full-time generalist because they've done it before. They know what works. They've seen these problems, so they can usually diagnose them faster and help you avoid spending limited budget in the wrong places.
You've done the fractional work. You've mapped your GTM. You know what needs to happen. Now you're ready to hire.
What should you look for?
Michael's answer: "I optimize for learning rather than execution."
Your first marketing hire isn't walking into a well-oiled machine. They're walking into ambiguity, a bunch of hypotheses, untested assumptions.
So you don't need someone who's "done demand gen at three companies and knows exactly how to run Facebook ads."
You need someone who asks good questions and digs into why things work. Someone comfortable pivoting when the first approach doesn't land. Someone who can think beyond tactics to what actually moves the business, and who won't freeze when there's no playbook to follow.
Michael put it this way: "It's a marketer who's adaptable, who's strategic, who's curious, who's probably comfortable with some ambiguity because this is a first marketing hire where there are a lot of assumptions but they're untested. We're going to figure it out on the fly."
They need to be hands-on-keyboard. This isn't a pure strategy role. But learning ability matters more than past execution when you're still figuring out what works.
Founders tend to start with "we need a head of marketing" and then try to figure out what that person does.
Michael flips it: "An org chart will tell you who reports to who. Looking at responsibility tells you who owns what."
Start with the work.
What needs to get done in your business right now? List it out:
Who's doing each of these today? (The answer is probably "founder" or "nobody.")
Which of these is the biggest bottleneck to growth?
That's your first hire. The person who can own the thing that's actually broken.
Michael calls this thinking about "tomorrow's business." You're forecasting into the future. If I hire someone to own demand gen today, what does that free up the founder to do? What's the next bottleneck after that?
This is how you build a GTM team with intention instead of reacting to whatever feels urgent. If you're stuck deciding between a generalist and a specialist for this hire, I've written more on who to hire first at $3M-$10M ARR.
I asked Michael what mistake he sees most often. "The mistake founders make too often is, 'This is the part that's going really well that I'm doing. I'm going to hire somebody to take it off my plate.' Which is a logical framework. But you're just duplicating your own strengths."
If you're a founder who's great at content and positioning, don't hire a content person first.
Hire the person who can do the thing you can't.
Maybe you're terrible at paid ads. Maybe you don't understand technical SEO. Maybe event marketing makes your skin crawl.
Your first hire should go where you're weakest.
Michael's rule: "Every marketing hire, every go-to-market hire, should remove a bottleneck. Not just add another layer."
If you hire someone and the business doesn't move faster, you hired wrong.
I see it all the time. Founders hire a "head of marketing" who spends three months figuring out what to do, has a bunch of meetings with the founder, and nothing ships. That's just adding process on top of the problem.
Before you hire, ask:
If the answer is vague ("we'll have marketing covered"), you're not ready.
Michael said something I keep coming back to: "Companies don't just outgrow their marketing. They outgrow the leadership systems connecting marketing to the rest of the business."
When founders come to me and say "we need a marketer," what they often mean is:
Those are leadership and systems problems. A marketing generalist can't fix them alone.
You need strategic clarity first. Then you can hire someone to execute against that clarity.
If your org is chaotic, your founder is the bottleneck on every decision, and your team doesn't know what the priorities are, you can hire the best marketer in the world and they'll fail.
Fix the org health first. Then hire the person who fills the specific gap you've identified. For the fuller walkthrough of the hiring process itself, see how to hire a marketer as a SaaS founder.
This post was based on a conversation with Michael Rowell, founder of Propel EQ, helping technical founders build companies they're proud of through fractional executive leadership spanning go-to-market, organizational health, and founder enablement. You can find him on LinkedIn.
Need help figuring out your first GTM hire? I work with seed to Series A founders on recruiting strategy, making sure you're hiring the right role in the first place. Connect with me on LinkedIn or book a time to chat.
Specialized recruiting partner for growing SaaS companies needing talent that drives real results.
